crotchety old man

At the risk of sounding like Andy Rooney, why are nearly all brands of men’s underwear sold in the following sizes (in inches): S(28-30), M(32-34), L(36-38), and so on (another alternative I’ve seen recently, possibly reflecting the obesification of American, is for the 28-30 range to be called XS, 30-32 S, 34-36 M, etc., but the ranges—and the problem—remain the same)? What are you supposed to do if your waist measures between 30 and 32 inches, or between 34 and 36? For someone whose waistline has expanded from 30 to 31 inches, for example, small underwear would be too tight and constricting, but medium underwear too baggy and loose.

I’m beginning to think I may have to start going commando.

Related Entries

1 Comment

I've been called a curmudgeon for similar rants :) I'm a 33

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by thom published on August 17, 2007 1:50 PM.

updating the blog was the previous entry in this blog.

catgonnit is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About me

Thom Watson was born in a "pro-America" part of the country but then grew up to become a gay, liberal, Harvard-educated atheist living in northern California. He has come to terms with the fact that this pretty much disqualifies him from ever holding public office.

» More...

Find Me Online

Email me
Flickr
Twitter
Facebook
Last.fm
LinkedIn
delicious

My Partner, Jeff

Blog
Flickr
Twitter
Facebook

The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism

Recent Entries

  • two panoramas from today

    This afternoon we had brunch at the Park Chalet on the Great Highway, and then walked across the road to Ocean Beach to take some...

  • links for 2008-11-24

    Atlas of True Names Cool gazetteer which reveals the etymological roots of place names. E.g., San Francisco is "St. Littlefrank," Florida is "Blossoming land,"...

  • yet another opinion from Andrew Sullivan I could do without

    Andrew Sullivan today wrote that California's Prop. 8 "should stand, and the court should decline to reverse it. We lost. They won in a fair...

  • "it was a great feeling, while it lasted"

    I was really moved by Keith Olbermann's "Special Comment" in regards to same-sex marriage and California's Prop. 8 earlier this week, and several straight friends...

  • the republic, for which it misunderstands

    I'd been planning to write this post since the passage of California's Proposition 8 last Tuesday eliminating the right of same-sex couples to marry, but...

Close