a marriage issue of convenience

OK, gay Republicans, the gauntlet has been thrown... your man has decided that "if necessary" means "now." The press is reporting this morning that Bush has decided to endorse a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage. So what are you going to do now, Log Cabin? That "seat at the table" you kept crowing about turns out to have been nothing more than a bowl on the floor, empty even of scraps.

The Washington Post reports that "Republican officials said Bush's decision to proceed now was driven partly by his desire to start the general election campaign on a fresh issue, at a time when his credibility has been battered by questions about prewar warnings of unconventional weapons in Iraq, as well as doubts raised by Democrats about his National Guard service."

Well, isn't that great. They've finally realized, as Bush's ratings slip, that the public is wising up to his shortcomings as a self-described "war president," so they're going to scapegoat gays and lesbians. Gay marriage will be the "fresh issue" they hope to use to divert the public's attention back away from Bush's miserable showing on the economy, the failure of his nationbuilding in Iraq, his unprecedented profligacy in terms of federal spending, his pandering to big business and anti-environment concerns... the list goes on.

Can't find a job? Worried about your children's future in a world of massive debt? Disgusted by the ever-increasing toll on human life and funnelling of U.S. billions to Halliburton caused by the situation in Iraq? Don't worry. Be happy. You're better than those nasty queers, after all. Stick it to them, and everything else will turn out all right, doncha know?

5 Comments

God, Bush is such a dork. I am really curious as to how the LCRs will respond to this, too.

Bush makes my ass itch. Feh.

You have any links for that? I looked around online and couldn't find any information confirming it. Of course, I didn't check your source... *doh* Just realized that.

I find it odd that Andrew Sullivan hasn't commented on it yet. Maybe the news will hit the press tomorrow...

Speaking of Sullivan, check out his essay in Time ("Why the M Word Matters to Me"). Good stuff.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by thom published on February 11, 2004 9:20 AM.

elf-indulgent radio: sound affect was the previous entry in this blog.

the chopping bloch is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

About me

Thom Watson was born in a "pro-America" part of the country but then grew up to become a gay, liberal, Harvard-educated atheist living in northern California. He has come to terms with the fact that this pretty much disqualifies him from ever holding public office.

» More...

Find Me Online

Email me
Flickr
Twitter
Facebook
Last.fm
LinkedIn
delicious

My Partner, Jeff

Blog
Flickr
Twitter
Facebook

The Out Campaign: Scarlet Letter of Atheism

Recent Entries

  • two panoramas from today

    This afternoon we had brunch at the Park Chalet on the Great Highway, and then walked across the road to Ocean Beach to take some...

  • links for 2008-11-24

    Atlas of True Names Cool gazetteer which reveals the etymological roots of place names. E.g., San Francisco is "St. Littlefrank," Florida is "Blossoming land,"...

  • yet another opinion from Andrew Sullivan I could do without

    Andrew Sullivan today wrote that California's Prop. 8 "should stand, and the court should decline to reverse it. We lost. They won in a fair...

  • "it was a great feeling, while it lasted"

    I was really moved by Keith Olbermann's "Special Comment" in regards to same-sex marriage and California's Prop. 8 earlier this week, and several straight friends...

  • the republic, for which it misunderstands

    I'd been planning to write this post since the passage of California's Proposition 8 last Tuesday eliminating the right of same-sex couples to marry, but...

Close